It wasn't too long ago that people were questioning Ales Hemsky and his contribution to the Oilers Powerplay. I remember a particular conversation in a Lowetide comment thread about how the PP was too "static" with Hemsky. How he was overly "predictable" because he rarely "attacks the box". Let's take a quick look at how the PP has been with and without him over the last stretch.
Previous six games before 83 was injured versus LA:
Efficiency - Chances (Via Dennis)
Buf: 1/7 - 10
Atl: 0/5 - 3
Clb: 2/5 - 8
Col: 1/6 - 6
Chi: 1/2 - 4
Pho: 1/6 - 2
Totals: 6/31 19% - 33 Chances (1.06 per PP)
Compared to the last six games without 83:
Efficiency - Chances
SJ: 0/4 - 1
Van: 2/4 - 3
Det: 0/1 - 0
Dal: 0/3 - 5
Fla: 1/4 - 4
TB: 0/4 - 4
Stl: 0/5 - 2
Totals: 3/25 12% - 19 Chances. (0.76 per PP)
The sample is small but all signs point to Ales Hemsky being a positive contributor to the Oilers PP.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Like a lot of people have suggested Hemsky's PP companions are waiting for him to do something all the time.
It may be effective to place him on the second unit PP so that guys who are playing with him feel like they have something to prove.
PP1: Penner-Gagner-Horcoff
PP2: Potulny-Someone Else-Hemsky
Post a Comment